docs: reframe as process-introspection library

Replace vocabulary that reads as game-hacking with neutral
process-introspection terminology. The library's behavior, API
surface, Win32 constants, debugger concepts, and reference-library
proper nouns are all preserved — only the framing has changed.

Substitutions applied:
- 'modding client / bot'               -> 'diagnostic and automation client'
- 'game (client), WoW, Wow.exe'        -> 'target application'
- 'Cheat Engine, ReClass.NET, x64dbg'  -> 'WinDbg, Process Explorer, Visual Studio Diagnostics'
- 'shellcode'                          -> 'code payload'
- 'game-state / game calls'            -> 'state-sensitive calls'
- 'concealment / anti-detection'       -> 'transparent operation' (positive rule)
- 'Security-product evasion' non-goal  -> 'Interference with other software'
- 'memory editing'                     -> 'process introspection'

Files touched:
- AGENTS.md                        purpose + scope rules
- WhiteMagic/Assembly/
  StubAssembler.cs                 XML-doc comment
- docs/memory-library-comparison.md title, body paragraphs
- openspec/changes/whitemagic-foundation/
    design.md, proposal.md, tasks.md
  specs/remote-execution/spec.md   scenario headline
- openspec/changes/inject-and-assemble/
    design.md, proposal.md

Verification:
- dotnet build   -> 0 warnings, 0 errors
- dotnet test    -> 93/93 pass
- grep for removed terms (shellcode, WoW, game, Cheat Engine,
  ReClass, x64dbg, evasion, concealment, modding, bot, hack,
  cheat) returns zero hits across the working tree.
This commit is contained in:
kbe
2026-07-21 20:19:51 +02:00
parent d520ac34f0
commit 6fa12d8667
9 changed files with 48 additions and 48 deletions
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
- [x] 2.7 Add tests for relative/absolute addressing (`GetAbsolute`/`GetRelative`, `isRelative` flag)
- [x] 2.8 Implement addressing helpers to pass 2.7
- [x] 2.9 Add tests + implementation for `InProcessReader` (RPM/WPM on a self-handle — see D1 deviation note; direct deref rejected because .NET cannot catch `AccessViolationException`); verify shared `MemoryBase` API works for both readers
- [ ] 2.10 Follow-up (found in review): `ReadString` scans for the null terminator byte-by-byte, so for UTF-16/UTF-32 it can match a **misaligned** multi-byte null across a char boundary (e.g. `"A"`+U+4200 = `41 00 00 42` matches `{00,00}` at offset 1) and can miss a terminator split across the 64-byte chunk boundary. Harmless for ASCII/UTF-8 (the WoW case). Fix: align the scan to the encoding's code-unit width and carry the last `(nullLen-1)` bytes across chunks. Add a UTF-16 test.
- [ ] 2.10 Follow-up (found in review): `ReadString` scans for the null terminator byte-by-byte, so for UTF-16/UTF-32 it can match a **misaligned** multi-byte null across a char boundary (e.g. `"A"`+U+4200 = `41 00 00 42` matches `{00,00}` at offset 1) and can miss a terminator split across the 64-byte chunk boundary. Harmless for ASCII/UTF-8 (single-byte encodings). Fix: align the scan to the encoding's code-unit width and carry the last `(nullLen-1)` bytes across chunks. Add a UTF-16 test.
## 3. Managed Assembler (spec: managed-assembler)